What is the research workbook for, and how do you keep it as a working record of thinking rather than a scrapbook?
Keep a research workbook for the thematic investigation, using it to gather sources, record observations and analysis, and develop thinking, so it functions as a working record of the inquiry rather than a decorative scrapbook
A focused answer to the H2 Art outcome on the research workbook. What it is for, how to combine sources with analysis and developing thinking, the link between research and studio work, and how to avoid the decorative-scrapbook trap.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
SEAB wants you to keep a research workbook for the thematic investigation and use it well: to gather sources, record observations and analysis, and develop your thinking, so it functions as a working record of the inquiry rather than a decorative scrapbook. The central insight is that the workbook is judged on the quality of thinking it records, not on how it looks. A beautiful arrangement of images is a mood board; a strong workbook pairs every source with analysis and shows ideas developing over time toward the studio work. The workbook is where the investigation actually happens, so it should read as a record of genuine, evolving thought.
The answer
What the research workbook is for
The research workbook is the working record of the thematic investigation. It is where you gather sources (artworks, artists, contexts, your own observations), analyse them, try things out, and develop your thinking over the course of the inquiry. It serves the line of inquiry, holding the material and reasoning that pursue your question, and it feeds the studio work, since research and making develop together in its pages. It is a laboratory and a logbook, not a presentation piece.
Sources plus analysis, not images alone
The defining quality of a strong workbook is that sources are always paired with thinking. Collecting attractive images is not research; analysing them is. For each source you include, the workbook should say why you chose it, what specifically it shows (its formal qualities, its meaning, its method), and how it relates to your inquiry and your own making. Images with no analysis are a mood board; images with analysis are evidence within an investigation. The writing is what turns collecting into research.
Recording developing thinking
A workbook is not a static collection but a record of thought in motion. It should show ideas evolving: questions raised, possibilities tried, dead ends recognised, directions changed. Reading through it, an examiner should be able to follow how your thinking developed from early, tentative responses toward a clearer understanding that informs the studio work. This visible development is exactly what is valued, because it evidences a genuine investigation rather than a conclusion arrived at without work.
Linking research to studio work
The workbook is where research and making meet. Sources prompt experiments; experiments raise questions that send you back to research; analysis of an artist's method suggests something to try in your own work. A strong workbook keeps this traffic visible, showing how the research feeds the practice and the practice tests the research. This is what makes the thematic investigation genuinely thematic: the looking and the making develop the same inquiry together, rather than running on separate tracks.
Examples in context
Example 1. Leonardo's notebooks. Leonardo da Vinci's notebooks combine observation, analysis, diagrams and developing ideas across art and science, with sources and thinking interwoven rather than images merely collected. They are the archetype of a working research record: a place where looking, analysis and experiment develop together over time, exactly the function a Coursework research workbook is meant to serve, far removed from a decorative scrapbook.
Example 2. The artist's working sketchbook tradition. Across art history, artists have kept sketchbooks that mix studies from other artists, written notes, observations and trial ideas, recording how their thinking developed toward finished work. This tradition models the research workbook's purpose: not to present a polished result, but to make visible the genuine, evolving investigation that leads to it, with sources analysed and ideas tested on the page.
Try this
Q1. What is the purpose of the research workbook? [3 marks]
- Cue. It is the working record of the thematic investigation: a place to gather sources, record analysis, experiment and develop thinking over time, feeding the studio work and serving the line of inquiry.
Q2. What distinguishes a strong workbook from a decorative scrapbook? [3 marks]
- Cue. A strong workbook pairs every source with analysis tied to the inquiry and shows ideas developing over time; a scrapbook arranges attractive images with little analysis and no development.
Q3. Why should the workbook keep research and studio work connected? [3 marks]
- Cue. Because the investigation is thematic: sources prompt experiments and experiments send you back to research, so keeping the traffic visible shows the looking and making developing the same inquiry together.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of SEAB exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
Original8 marksExplain the purpose of a research workbook in the thematic investigation, and what distinguishes a strong workbook from a decorative scrapbook. Refer to your own practice or a worked example.Show worked answer →
Open by stating that the workbook is a working record of the inquiry: where sources are gathered, observations and analysis are written, experiments are tried, and thinking visibly develops over time.
Develop the distinction. A decorative scrapbook collects attractive images with little analysis and no development; a strong workbook pairs every source with thinking, why it was chosen, what it shows, how it relates to the inquiry, and tracks ideas evolving toward the studio work. The strong workbook reads as a record of an investigation; the scrapbook reads as a mood board. Note that examiners value evidence of genuine, developing thought, not presentation.
Reach a judgement: the workbook is judged on the quality of investigation it records, not on how pretty it looks. Markers reward a clear account of its purpose, the scrapbook-versus-workbook distinction, the pairing of sources with analysis, and the link to developing studio work.
Original6 marksA research workbook is full of beautifully arranged images of artworks but contains almost no writing. Explain the weakness and how to develop the workbook into genuine research.Show worked answer →
State the weakness: arranged images without writing show taste and effort but no thinking. There is no analysis of what the works show, no connection to the inquiry, and no evidence of developing ideas, so it is a mood board, not research.
Give the fix. For each source, add analysis: why it was chosen, what specifically it shows (its formal qualities and meaning), and how it feeds the inquiry and the student's own making. Add the student's responses, experiments prompted by the source, and reflection on where the thinking is going. The images stay, but they become evidence within a developing investigation.
Reach a judgement: research is sources plus analysis plus developing thought, not images alone. Markers reward the diagnosis (mood board versus research), the addition of analysis tied to the inquiry, and the demonstration of developing thinking and studio links.
Related dot points
- Develop a line of inquiry for the thematic investigation, framing a researchable question from a personal theme and using it to direct both the research and the studio work toward a coherent investigation
A focused answer to the H2 Art outcome on developing a line of inquiry. How to frame a researchable question from a theme, keep research and studio work aligned, and avoid an inquiry that is too vague or too closed.
- Source and analyse artist references for the thematic investigation, selecting relevant artists, analysing how they achieve their effects, and drawing from them to inform your own practice rather than copying
A focused answer to the H2 Art outcome on artist references. How to choose relevant artists, analyse their methods rather than just admire them, draw on them to inform your own work, and avoid copying or name-dropping.
- Use contextual study to feed the studio work, drawing on art-historical, cultural and social context to deepen the meaning of your own practice and connect your investigation to wider art
A focused answer to the H2 Art outcome on contextual study and practice. How art-historical, cultural and social context deepens your own work, how to connect your inquiry to wider art, and how to avoid context that is bolted on rather than felt.
- Document the media and processes used in Coursework, recording experiments, technical choices and the reasoning behind decisions so the development of the work is visible and the handling of materials is evidenced
A focused answer to the H2 Art Coursework outcome on documenting media and process. How to record media experiments and technical choices, explain the reasoning behind decisions, and evidence the handling of materials without padding.
- Build the preparatory work and portfolio for Coursework, showing a clear line of development from initial studies through experiments to refined outcomes, and select and sequence the work so the body reads as a coherent investigation
A focused answer to the H2 Art Coursework outcome on preparatory work and the portfolio. What counts as preparatory work, how to show development from studies to refined outcomes, and how to select and sequence a coherent body of work.