How do we prove and solve inequalities rigorously, and which standard inequalities are worth knowing?
Prove and apply inequalities including the use of the discriminant, completing the square, and standard results such as the AM-GM inequality
A focused answer to the H2 Further Mathematics outcome on proving and applying inequalities. Algebraic manipulation, completing the square, the discriminant condition, the AM-GM inequality, and rigorous proof techniques.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
SEAB wants you to prove inequalities rigorously and to solve inequalities that arise in algebra. You should be fluent with the "consider the difference" method, completing the square, the discriminant condition for a quadratic, and standard results such as the arithmetic mean-geometric mean (AM-GM) inequality. The recurring idea is that a real square is never negative, which underlies most proofs.
The answer
The fundamental fact
The whole topic rests on one observation:
Most inequality proofs reduce to showing that some expression is a sum of squares.
Proving an inequality: consider the difference
To prove , examine the difference and show it is non-negative, typically by writing it as a square or a sum of squares. For example follows from .
Completing the square
Any quadratic can be written as
If the squared term is non-negative, so the minimum value is , attained at . This both proves inequalities and locates extrema.
The discriminant condition
For a quadratic with real coefficients, the discriminant controls the roots:
- : two distinct real roots;
- : one repeated real root;
- : no real roots, so the quadratic keeps a constant sign (the sign of ).
The case with means for all real , a powerful way to prove an inequality holds everywhere.
Solving polynomial and rational inequalities
To solve an inequality, bring everything to one side so it compares with , factor, and analyse the sign on each interval determined by the critical values. For rational inequalities never multiply across by an expression of unknown sign; instead combine into a single fraction and test signs.
The AM-GM inequality
For non-negative reals, the arithmetic mean is at least the geometric mean. For two terms:
with equality when . This follows directly from .
Examples in context
Example 1. Showing a quadratic is always positive. To prove for all real , compute ; with a positive leading coefficient this guarantees the expression is positive everywhere, a one-line proof.
Example 2. Optimisation by AM-GM. For a positive variable, follows from AM-GM with , , giving the minimum value at . This kind of bound appears throughout optimisation arguments.
Try this
Q1. Prove that for all real . [2 marks]
- Cue. Complete the square: , or note with positive leading coefficient.
Q2. Solve . [2 marks]
- Cue. Factor , which holds between the roots: .
Q3. State the AM-GM inequality for two non-negative numbers and the equality condition. [1 mark]
- Cue. for , with equality when .
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of SEAB exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
Original4 marksProve that for all real and , and state the condition for equality.Show worked answer →
Consider the difference . This factors as a perfect square:
A real square is always non-negative, so , hence , that is .
Equality holds exactly when , that is when .
Markers reward forming the difference, recognising the perfect square, the statement that a square is non-negative, and the correct equality condition .
Original6 marksFind the set of values of for which the equation has no real roots.Show worked answer →
A quadratic has no real roots when its discriminant is negative: .
Here , , , so
Expand: , that is .
Factor: . This holds between the roots, so .
Markers reward the discriminant condition , the correct expansion, factoring the quadratic in , and reading off the interval .
Related dot points
- Prove statements about sums, divisibility and inequalities for all positive integers using the principle of mathematical induction
A focused answer to the H2 Further Mathematics outcome on proof by mathematical induction. The principle, the base case and inductive step, and worked proofs for sums, divisibility and inequalities with the markers each step earns.
- Solve first- and second-order linear recurrence relations with constant coefficients and find closed-form expressions for the nth term
A focused answer to the H2 Further Mathematics outcome on linear recurrence relations. First-order and second-order constant-coefficient recurrences, the characteristic equation, repeated and complex roots, and particular solutions for non-homogeneous cases.
- Sum finite series using the method of differences, standard results for powers of integers, and partial fractions
A focused answer to the H2 Further Mathematics outcome on summing series. The method of differences (telescoping), the standard sums of powers of integers, partial fractions to create a telescoping form, and recovering sums to infinity.
- Construct rigorous mathematical arguments using direct proof, proof by contradiction, proof by contrapositive, and disproof by counterexample
A focused answer to the H2 Further Mathematics outcome on methods of proof. Direct proof, proof by contradiction, proof by contrapositive, disproof by counterexample, and the logical language of implication, converse and equivalence.