Why did the League of Nations fail to stop aggression in the 1930s, and how did this help cause the Second World War?
Explain why the League of Nations failed to prevent aggression in the 1930s, using Manchuria and Abyssinia, and how this contributed to the Second World War
A focused answer to the O-Level History dot point on the failure of the League in the 1930s. The Manchurian and Abyssinian crises, the impact of the Depression, the self-interest of Britain and France, and how the League's failure encouraged aggression.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
SEAB wants you to explain why the League of Nations failed to prevent aggression in the 1930s, using the key examples of the Manchurian crisis (1931) and the Abyssinian crisis (1935), and how this failure helped lead to the Second World War. You should be able to explain the reasons for the failure (the League's lack of an army, its reliance on weak sanctions, the self-interest of Britain and France, and the impact of the Depression) and how each crisis exposed the League's weakness. The task is explanation: link the League's failures to the growing confidence of aggressors and the drift toward war.
The answer
From hope to failure
In the 1920s the League of Nations had some successes and seemed to offer hope of lasting peace. But in the 1930s it faced a much harder test: aggression by powerful states. The Great Depression after 1929 made the situation worse, because countries focused on their own economic survival and were less willing to cooperate or to take risks for collective security. When determined aggressors challenged the League, its built-in weaknesses, especially its lack of an army and the self-interest of its leading members, were cruelly exposed.
The Manchurian crisis, 1931
The first great test was the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931. Japan, a member of the League, seized this region of China by force. China appealed to the League, which sent a commission to investigate. The commission took a long time, and eventually condemned Japan as the aggressor and called for it to withdraw. But the League had no army to enforce this, and its members would not risk war or impose serious sanctions, partly because Manchuria was far away and they had their own troubles in the Depression. Japan simply ignored the League and walked out of it in 1933, keeping Manchuria. The League had been openly defied and could do nothing.
The Abyssinian crisis, 1935
An even more damaging failure came when Mussolini's Italy invaded Abyssinia (modern Ethiopia) in 1935. This was a clear act of aggression against a fellow member, and it happened in Africa, much closer to Europe. The League declared Italy the aggressor and imposed economic sanctions. But the sanctions were deliberately weak: they did not include oil, which Italy needed for its war, and the Suez Canal, controlled by Britain, was kept open so Italy could move troops and supplies. Worst of all, Britain and France secretly drew up a plan (the Hoare-Laval Pact) to give Mussolini most of Abyssinia in return for peace. When this leaked, there was public outrage, but the damage was done. Italy conquered Abyssinia, and the League's authority was shattered.
Why the League failed
These crises revealed why the League could not stop aggression. It had no army of its own, so it depended on economic sanctions, which only worked if applied fully by all members. The leading members, Britain and France, put their own interests first: they feared war, wanted to protect their trade, and even hoped to keep Italy as a friend against Germany, which is why they undermined sanctions over Abyssinia. The Depression made all states more selfish and inward-looking. And the absence of the United States, together with the departure of Japan and later Germany, left the League weaker still. In the end it could condemn aggression with words but could not back them with action.
Examples in context
Example 1. Japan walks out of the League. When the League condemned Japan over Manchuria, Japan's response was simply to leave the organisation in 1933 and keep its conquest. This showed every other state that a powerful aggressor could defy the League with no real consequences. It set a dangerous precedent that Italy and then Germany would follow, undermining the whole idea of collective security.
Example 2. The Hoare-Laval Pact. The secret plan by the British and French foreign ministers to give Mussolini most of Abyssinia, in the hope of keeping Italy friendly against Germany, is the clearest example of how self-interest destroyed the League. When the plan leaked, the public was outraged and the ministers were disgraced, but the episode proved that the League's leading members would betray collective security for their own strategic ends.
Try this
Q1. Which country invaded Abyssinia in 1935? [3 marks]
- Cue. Italy, under Mussolini, invading Abyssinia (modern Ethiopia).
Q2. Explain why economic sanctions failed to stop Italy over Abyssinia. [5 marks]
- Cue. The sanctions left out oil, which Italy needed, and the Suez Canal stayed open; Britain and France would not enforce strong measures, hoping to keep Italy as an ally, so the sanctions were too weak to work.
Q3. "The League of Nations failed in the 1930s mainly because it had no army." How far do you agree? [8 marks]
- Cue. Argue the lack of force mattered, but weigh it against the self-interest of Britain and France, the impact of the Depression and the absent powers before judging.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of SEAB exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
Original5 marksDescribe how the League of Nations responded to the Italian invasion of Abyssinia in 1935.Show worked answer →
Aim for a clear description of the League's response and its failure.
- Point
- The League condemned Italy's invasion of Abyssinia (Ethiopia) but failed to stop it.
- Evidence
- The League declared Italy the aggressor and imposed economic sanctions, but the sanctions did not include oil and did not close the Suez Canal, so they were too weak to hurt Italy seriously. Behind the scenes, Britain and France even discussed giving much of Abyssinia to Italy.
- Explanation
- Because the leading members put their own interests first and would not take strong action, Italy conquered Abyssinia and the League was exposed as powerless.
Markers reward describing the limited sanctions and their failure, and a sentence on how Britain and France's self-interest undermined the response.
Original8 marksExplain why the League of Nations failed to prevent aggression in the 1930s.Show worked answer →
Use two or three developed reasons in point-evidence-explanation form.
- Reason 1 (no army and weak sanctions)
- The League had no armed forces of its own and relied on economic sanctions, which only worked if all members applied them fully. In the Abyssinian crisis the sanctions left out oil, so they failed to stop Italy.
- Reason 2 (self-interest of Britain and France)
- The leading members put their own interests first. They were reluctant to risk war or harm their trade, and in the Abyssinian crisis they even secretly discussed handing land to Italy, which destroyed the League's credibility.
- Reason 3 (the impact of the Depression and absent powers)
- The Great Depression made countries focus on their own economies and act more selfishly. With the United States never a member, and other powers leaving, the League lacked the strength to face determined aggressors such as Japan, Italy and Germany.
- Link
- Lacking force, unity and the great powers' commitment, the League could condemn aggression but not stop it, which encouraged further aggression.
Markers reward developed explanation, specific reference to Manchuria and Abyssinia, and a clear focus on why the League failed.
Related dot points
- Explain the aims and structure of the League of Nations and the reasons for its weaknesses in the 1920s and 1930s
A focused answer to the O-Level History dot point on the League of Nations. Its aims and structure, the absence of major powers, the lack of an army, the principle of collective security, and the weaknesses that limited its success.
- Explain Hitler's foreign policy aims and his expansionist actions in the 1930s up to 1938
A focused answer to the O-Level History dot point on Hitler's foreign policy. His aims of overturning Versailles, uniting German-speakers and gaining living space, and his actions: rearmament, the Rhineland, the Anschluss with Austria and the Sudetenland.
- Explain the reasons for the policy of appeasement, focusing on the Munich Agreement of 1938, and assess its effects
A focused answer to the O-Level History dot point on appeasement. The reasons Britain and France gave way to Hitler, the Munich Agreement over the Sudetenland in 1938, the arguments for and against the policy, and how it affected the coming of war.
- Explain why militarists came to dominate Japan and why Japan began to expand aggressively in Asia in the 1930s
A focused answer to the O-Level History dot point on the rise of militarism in Japan. The effects of the Depression, the weakness of civilian government, the appeal of expansion for resources, and the invasion of Manchuria in 1931.