Research and Investigation: how Singapore O-Level Design and Technology designers gather primary and secondary evidence, apply anthropometrics and ergonomics, analyse products and write a justified specification
A Singapore O-Level Design and Technology (SEAB 7059) module overview of research and investigation. Primary versus secondary research, anthropometrics and ergonomics with percentiles, product analysis, and turning findings into a justified, measurable design specification, with links to every dot point.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Jump to a section
What this module covers
Research and Investigation is where a design stops being guesswork and starts being grounded in evidence. In O-Level Design and Technology (SEAB 7059), the marks at this stage come from gathering relevant information, applying it to real users, and converting it into a measurable specification. In the Design Project, this is the section that turns a given situation into clear targets to design toward; in the written paper, it appears as questions on research methods, anthropometrics, ergonomics and specification writing. This overview links the four dot points and shows how they connect.
See the full set of dot points for this module under /sg-o-level/design-and-technology/syllabus/research-and-investigation.
Gathering the right evidence
The starting point is choosing methods that actually answer your questions. The primary and secondary research dot point distinguishes first-hand methods (interviews, observation, surveys, your own product testing) from existing sources (books, websites, datasheets). Secondary research gives quick background; primary research gives evidence specific to your users. The mark, though, is in turning findings into design requirements, not in collecting information for its own sake.
Fitting the product to the human body
Products must suit the people who use them, which is where anthropometrics and ergonomics comes in. Anthropometrics is body-measurement data; ergonomics is the wider science of designing for comfort, safety and efficiency. The key technique is the percentile: design from the 5th to the 95th percentile to suit about 90 percent of users, choosing the right percentile depending on whether reach, clearance or strength is the critical factor.
Learning from existing products
You do not design in a vacuum. Product analysis examines an existing product by function, materials, construction, ergonomics, aesthetics and cost, revealing features worth keeping and weaknesses worth improving. This is secondary-style evidence with a sharp purpose: every observation should suggest a requirement for your new and better design.
Turning evidence into targets
All the research converges on one output: a specification. Writing a design specification shows how to build justified, measurable points across function, ergonomics, materials, safety, cost and aesthetics, each traceable to a research finding. A specification with figures can be tested; one full of vague aims cannot, and that distinction is where marks are won and lost.
How this module is examined
- Choose and justify methods. Match primary or secondary research to the question, and explain why each method suits the problem.
- Apply percentiles correctly. Know what 5th and 95th percentile mean and design across the right range for reach, clearance or strength.
- Analyse products purposefully. Turn each observation about an existing product into a requirement for a better design.
- Write measurable, justified specification points. Cover function, ergonomics, materials, safety, cost and aesthetics, with figures and a research reason for each.
Check your knowledge
Short and calculation questions across the module. Attempt them, then check the worked solutions.
- State the difference between primary and secondary research, giving one example of each. (2 marks)
- State the difference between anthropometrics and ergonomics. (2 marks)
- Explain what the 5th to 95th percentile range means and roughly what proportion of users it suits. (2 marks)
- A handle is to be sized so its circumference matches a grip diameter of . Treating the handle as a cylinder, calculate the circumference. Use . (2 marks)
- Turn this finding into a measurable specification point: "users with small hands could not grip the thick handle". (1 mark)
Sources & how we know this
- Singapore-Cambridge GCE O-Level Design and Technology (Syllabus 7059) — Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board (2026)