How do you recast a writer's idea in your own words without lifting, distorting or padding it?
Paraphrase phrases and sentences accurately in your own words, preserving meaning while avoiding lifting from the passage
A focused answer to the General Paper comprehension skill of paraphrase. How to recast ideas in your own words, find the key content words to replace, preserve exact meaning, and avoid lifting and distortion, with worked technique.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
Paraphrase is the skill of recasting a writer's idea in your own words while keeping its meaning exactly. Paper 2 uses the instruction "in your own words as far as possible" to test whether you have understood an idea well enough to express it independently. The central insight is that a good paraphrase must satisfy two demands at once: it must be genuinely your own wording, not lifted phrasing, and it must be faithful to the original meaning, including every qualifier and logical link. Failing either way loses the mark.
The answer
Why "in your own words" is tested
Copying the passage's distinctive words shows only that you located the relevant sentence; it does not show that you understood the idea. Paraphrase questions exist precisely to make you demonstrate comprehension by re-expressing the meaning. This is why "lifting", reproducing the passage's content words, is penalised even when the copied sentence is correct.
Find the content words to replace
The technique is systematic. Identify the content words, the nouns, verbs and adjectives that carry the meaning, and replace them with accurate synonyms, while recasting the sentence structure. You need not replace every small word (articles, common prepositions), and some technical terms may have no good synonym. The phrase "in your own words as far as possible" acknowledges this: change the distinctive, replaceable words, not the unavoidable ones.
Preserve the meaning exactly
A paraphrase that is fluent but inaccurate is still wrong. Three meaning-killing errors are common:
- Dropping a qualifier. "Often", "may", "in part" and "only" carry real weight; losing them overstates or understates the claim.
- Reversing a relationship. Swapping cause and effect, or condition and consequence, changes the idea entirely.
- Overstating. Turning "can contribute to" into "causes" makes a claim the writer did not make.
After paraphrasing, check the new sentence against the original to confirm every relationship and qualifier has survived.
Recast structure, not just words
Strong paraphrase changes the shape of the sentence, not only individual words. If the original is "X, because Y", you might write "Y is the reason that X". Restructuring makes it genuinely your own and proves you have processed the idea rather than swapping a thesaurus's worth of synonyms into the original frame.
Examples in context
Example 1. A qualifier that must survive. A passage reads "Education can, in the right conditions, lift people out of poverty." A careless paraphrase, "education lifts people out of poverty", drops two qualifiers ("can" and "in the right conditions") and so overstates the claim into a guarantee the writer never made. A faithful version, "under the right circumstances, education has the potential to raise people out of poverty", keeps the hedged, conditional meaning, showing why checking qualifiers against the original is the decisive final step.
Example 2. Restructuring to prove understanding. Given "Cities grow unequal because opportunity clusters where capital already sits", a synonym-only attempt leaves the frame intact and reads as disguised lifting. A restructured paraphrase, "Because investment tends to concentrate in places that are already wealthy, the gap between rich and poor areas of a city widens", reorders the idea while preserving the causal link, demonstrating the genuine comprehension that the own-words instruction is designed to test.
Try this
Q1. Explain why lifting words from the passage is penalised in a paraphrase question. [2 marks]
- Cue. Copying the distinctive words shows only that you located the relevant sentence, not that you understood the idea, which is exactly what the paraphrase is meant to demonstrate.
Q2. Paraphrase: "Progress, unchecked, can outrun our capacity to manage its consequences." [2 marks]
- Cue. Something like: when advancement goes unregulated, it can move faster than our ability to deal with the effects it produces, keeping the conditional and the cause-and-effect.
Q3. Explain why dropping the word "often" can make a paraphrase inaccurate. [3 marks]
- Cue. "Often" hedges a claim to mean usually but not always; removing it converts a frequent tendency into a universal rule, so the paraphrase states something stronger and different from what the writer meant.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of SEAB exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
Original2 marksIn an original-style passage, a writer states: 'Affluence has bred a generation that mistakes comfort for happiness.' Using your own words as far as possible, explain what the writer means. [2 marks]Show worked answer →
Paraphrase: the writer means that growing wealth has produced young people who wrongly believe that an easy, materially secure life is the same thing as genuine contentment.
How to build it: identify the content words to replace - 'affluence' becomes growing wealth or prosperity; 'bred a generation' becomes produced young people; 'mistakes comfort for happiness' becomes wrongly equates an easy or secure life with true contentment.
What to preserve: the causal link (wealth has produced this), and the error being attributed (confusing comfort with happiness). The structure is recast, but the precise meaning is kept.
Markers reward replacement of the key content words with accurate synonyms, retention of the exact relationship between ideas, and avoidance of lifting distinctive phrasing.
Original2 marksExplain why paraphrase questions penalise both lifting from the passage and changing the meaning, and how to avoid each. [2 marks]Show worked answer →
Argument: lifting fails to demonstrate understanding, and altering the meaning shows misunderstanding, so a good paraphrase must be both independent in wording and faithful in sense.
Why lifting is penalised: copying the distinctive words of the passage proves only that you located them, not that you grasped the idea, which is exactly what the question tests.
Why distortion is penalised: a paraphrase that drops a qualifier, reverses a causal direction or overstates a claim conveys a different idea from the writer's, so it is inaccurate even if fluent.
How to avoid both: replace the key content words with synonyms and recast the sentence structure (avoid lifting), then check the new sentence against the original to confirm every relationship and qualifier survives (avoid distortion).
Markers reward wording that is genuinely the candidate's own and meaning that matches the original precisely, including its qualifiers and logical links.
Related dot points
- Make and support valid inferences from a passage, distinguishing what is implied from what is stated and using textual evidence
A focused answer to the General Paper comprehension skill of inference. How to read implied meaning, tone and attitude, ground inferences in textual evidence, and avoid over-reading, with worked technique on an original-style passage.
- Write a concise summary that selects the relevant points from a span of text, in your own words and within a word limit
A focused answer to the General Paper comprehension summary task. How to select relevant points, exclude examples and repetition, paraphrase into your own words, link points cohesively, and stay within the word limit, with worked technique.
- Explain the meaning of words and phrases as used in context, capturing connotation and the sense the writer intends
A focused answer to the General Paper vocabulary-in-context question. How to use surrounding cues to fix a word's intended sense, capture connotation, give a contextual not dictionary meaning, and phrase the answer in your own words.
- Answer the Application Question by selecting points from the passage, taking a reasoned stand and grounding it in concrete features of your own society
A focused answer to the General Paper Application Question. How to select points from the passage, agree or disagree with reasons, and ground the discussion in concrete Singaporean context rather than summarising the passage, with worked technique.