How does the Newton-Raphson method find a root of an equation, and when does it succeed or fail?
Apply the Newton-Raphson method to find a root of an equation numerically and discuss its convergence and failure cases
A focused answer to the H2 Further Mathematics outcome on the Newton-Raphson method. The iterative formula, its geometric meaning as a tangent intercept, choosing a starting value, the quadratic convergence, and the situations in which the method fails.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
SEAB wants you to apply the Newton-Raphson method to find a root of an equation numerically, to understand its geometric basis as the intercept of the tangent line, to perform iterations to a stated accuracy, and to discuss its convergence (typically fast) and the circumstances in which it fails.
The answer
The iterative formula
Starting from an estimate , the Newton-Raphson iteration is
Each step uses both the function value and its derivative at the current estimate.
The geometric meaning
At the point draw the tangent to the curve. The next estimate is where that tangent crosses the -axis. Because a smooth curve is well approximated by its tangent near a root, the estimates close in on the root rapidly.
Choosing a starting value
A good is one near the root, ideally with and the iteration well behaved nearby. Locating a sign change ( and of opposite sign) brackets a root and suggests a sensible start between and .
Convergence
When it works, Newton-Raphson converges quadratically: the number of correct decimal places roughly doubles each step. This is much faster than simple iteration, which is why it is the workhorse root-finder. Stop when successive estimates agree to the required accuracy.
When the method fails
The method can fail or behave badly when:
- is zero or near zero (a nearly horizontal tangent sends the estimate far away);
- the starting value is too far from the root (it may converge to a different root or diverge);
- the iteration falls into a cycle (oscillating between values without converging);
- there is an inflection or symmetry that causes the estimates to overshoot.
Examples in context
Example 1. Square roots inside a calculator. The iteration for is Newton-Raphson applied to , and is essentially the algorithm hardware uses to compute square roots quickly.
Example 2. Solving implicit equations in engineering. Equations such as the Colebrook equation for pipe friction have no closed-form solution and are solved by Newton-Raphson, which is why the method is built into engineering and scientific software.
Try this
Q1. Write the Newton-Raphson iteration formula. [1 mark]
- Cue. .
Q2. What does represent geometrically? [1 mark]
- Cue. The point where the tangent to the curve at crosses the -axis.
Q3. Why should the starting value avoid a turning point of ? [2 marks]
- Cue. There , so the correction is huge and throws the next estimate far from the root.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of SEAB exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
Original6 marksUse the Newton-Raphson method with to find a root of , giving two iterations and to four decimal places.Show worked answer →
The iteration is with and .
At : ; . So
At : ; . So
Markers reward the Newton-Raphson formula, the derivative, the substitution at each step, and , .
Original5 marksExplain, with reference to the tangent line, why the Newton-Raphson method may fail to converge if the starting value is chosen where is close to zero.Show worked answer →
Geometrically, each Newton-Raphson step replaces the curve by its tangent at and takes the next estimate to be where that tangent crosses the -axis. The step is .
If is close to zero, the tangent is nearly horizontal, so it crosses the axis a long way from . The correction becomes very large, throwing the next estimate far away, possibly past other roots or off to a region where the method diverges or oscillates.
In the extreme case (a turning point) the formula is undefined, as the horizontal tangent never meets the axis.
Markers reward the tangent-intercept interpretation, linking a small to a nearly horizontal tangent and a huge correction, and the undefined case at a turning point.
Related dot points
- Solve an equation by fixed-point iteration of the form x = g(x), and use the derivative condition to decide convergence
A focused answer to the H2 Further Mathematics outcome on fixed-point iteration. Rearranging f(x) = 0 into x = g(x), the iteration x_{n+1} = g(x_n), the staircase and cobweb diagrams, and the convergence condition that the magnitude of g prime is less than one.
- Approximate a definite integral using the trapezium rule and Simpson's rule and comment on the accuracy of the estimate
A focused answer to the H2 Further Mathematics outcome on numerical integration. The trapezium rule and Simpson's rule, the strip width and ordinates, applying each rule, the over- or under-estimate behaviour, and which rule is more accurate.
- Use Euler's method and the improved Euler (midpoint) method to obtain a numerical solution of a first-order differential equation
A focused answer to the H2 Further Mathematics outcome on numerical solution of ODEs. Euler's method as a tangent step, the step size, accumulation of error, and the improved Euler (midpoint) method for greater accuracy.
- Solve homogeneous second-order linear differential equations with constant coefficients using the auxiliary equation, covering real, repeated and complex roots
A focused answer to the H2 Further Mathematics outcome on homogeneous second-order linear ODEs. The auxiliary equation, the three cases of distinct real, repeated and complex roots, and applying two initial conditions to fix the constants.